During the last two decades there has been a swift and amazing development of Machine Learning techniques and algorithms that impact many areas in not only Science and Technology but also the Humanities, Social Sciences, Medicine, Law, indeed, almost all possible disciplines. The applications are incredibly many, from self-driving cars to solving high-dimensional differential equations or complicated quantum mechanical many-body problems. Machine Learning is perceived by many as one of the main disruptive techniques nowadays.
Statistics, Data science and Machine Learning form important fields of research in modern science. They describe how to learn and make predictions from data, as well as allowing us to extract important correlations about physical process and the underlying laws of motion in large data sets. The latter, big data sets, appear frequently in essentially all disciplines, from the traditional Science, Technology, Mathematics and Engineering fields to Life Science, Law, education research, the Humanities and the Social Sciences.
The aim of these notes is to give you a birds view over overarching issues on Machine Learning, a brief review of programming with Python and libraries we will use in this course, a reminder on statistics and finally our first encounters of Machine Learning methods applied to an evergreen in Nuclear Physics, fitting nuclear binding energies. If you are familiar with basic Python programming and statistics, you can easily jump some of the introductory material here.
After these introductory words, the set of lectures will contain the following themes:
Ideally, machine learning represents the science of giving computers the ability to learn without being explicitly programmed. The idea is that there exist generic algorithms which can be used to find patterns in a broad class of data sets without having to write code specifically for each problem. The algorithm will build its own logic based on the data. You should however always keep in mind that machines and algorithms are to a large extent developed by humans. The insights and knowledge we have about a specific system, play a central role when we develop a specific machine learning algorithm.
Machine learning is an extremely rich field, in spite of its young age. The increases we have seen during the last decades in computational capabilities have been followed by developments of methods and techniques for analyzing and handling large date sets, relying heavily on statistics, computer science and mathematics. The field is rather new and developing rapidly. Popular software libraries written in Python for machine learning like Scikit-learn, Tensorflow, PyTorch and Keras, all freely available at their respective GitHub sites, encompass communities of developers in the thousands or more. And the number of code developers and contributors keeps increasing.
Not all the algorithms and methods can be given a rigorous mathematical justification (for example decision trees and random forests), opening up thereby large rooms for experimenting and trial and error and thereby exciting new developments. However, a solid command of linear algebra, multivariate theory, probability theory, statistical data analysis, understanding errors and Monte Carlo methods are central elements in a proper understanding of many of the algorithms and methods we will discuss.
These sets of lectures aim at giving you an overview of central aspects of statistical data analysis as well as some of the central algorithms used in machine learning. We will introduce a variety of central algorithms and methods essential for studies of data analysis and machine learning.
Hands-on projects and experimenting with data and algorithms play a central role in these lectures, and our hope is, through the various examples discussed in this series of lectures, to expose you to fundamental research problems in these fields, with the aim to reproduce state of the art scientific results. More specifically, you will
The approaches to machine learning are many, but are often split into two main categories. In supervised learning we know the answer to a problem, and let the computer deduce the logic behind it. On the other hand, unsupervised learning is a method for finding patterns and relationship in data sets without any prior knowledge of the system. Some authours also operate with a third category, namely reinforcement learning. This is a paradigm of learning inspired by behavioral psychology, where learning is achieved by trial-and-error, solely from rewards and punishment.
Another way to categorize machine learning tasks is to consider the desired output of a system. Some of the most common tasks are:
The methods we cover have three main topics in common, irrespective of whether we deal with supervised or unsupervised learning.
At the heart of basically all Machine Learning algorithms we will encounter so-called minimization or optimization algorithms. A large family of such methods are so-called gradient methods.
When you hear phrases like predictions and estimations and correlations and causations, what do you think of? May be you think of the difference between classifying new data points and generating new data points. Or perhaps you consider that correlations represent some kind of symmetric statements like if \( A \) is correlated with \( B \), then \( B \) is correlated with \( A \). Causation on the other hand is directional, that is if \( A \) causes \( B \), \( B \) does not necessarily cause \( A \).
These concepts are in some sense the difference between machine learning and statistics. In machine learning and prediction based tasks, we are often interested in developing algorithms that are capable of learning patterns from given data in an automated fashion, and then using these learned patterns to make predictions or assessments of newly given data. In many cases, our primary concern is the quality of the predictions or assessments, and we are less concerned about the underlying patterns that were learned in order to make these predictions.
In machine learning we normally use a so-called frequentist approach, where the aim is to make predictions and find correlations. We focus less on for example extracting a probability distribution function (PDF). The PDF can be used in turn to make estimations and find causations such as given \( A \) what is the likelihood of finding \( B \).
In science and engineering we often end up in situations where we want to infer (or learn) a quantitative model \( M \) for a given set of sample points \( \boldsymbol{X} \in [x_1, x_2,\dots x_N] \).
As we will see repeatedely in these lectures, we could try to fit these data points to a model given by a straight line, or if we wish to be more sophisticated to a more complex function.
The reason for inferring such a model is that it serves many useful purposes. On the one hand, the model can reveal information encoded in the data or underlying mechanisms from which the data were generated. For instance, we could discover important corelations that relate interesting physics interpretations.
In addition, it can simplify the representation of the given data set and help us in making predictions about future data samples.
A first important consideration to keep in mind is that inferring the correct model for a given data set is an elusive, if not impossible, task. The fundamental difficulty is that if we are not specific about what we mean by a correct model, there could easily be many different models that fit the given data set equally well.
The central question is this: what leads us to say that a model is correct or optimal for a given data set? To make the model inference problem well posed, i.e., to guarantee that there is a unique optimal model for the given data, we need to impose additional assumptions or restrictions on the class of models considered. To this end, we should not be looking for just any model that can describe the data. Instead, we should look for a model \( M \) that is the best among a restricted class of models. In addition, to make the model inference problem computationally tractable, we need to specify how restricted the class of models needs to be. A common strategy is to start with the simplest possible class of models that is just necessary to describe the data or solve the problem at hand. More precisely, the model class should be rich enough to contain at least one model that can fit the data to a desired accuracy and yet be restricted enough that it is relatively simple to find the best model for the given data.
Thus, the most popular strategy is to start from the simplest class of models and increase the complexity of the models only when the simpler models become inadequate. For instance, if we work with a regression problem to fit a set of sample points, one may first try the simplest class of models, namely linear models, followed obviously by more complex models.
How to evaluate which model fits best the data is something we will come back to over and over again in these set of lectures.
Python plays nowadays a central role in the development of machine learning techniques and tools for data analysis. In particular, seen the wealth of machine learning and data analysis libraries written in Python, easy to use libraries with immediate visualization(and not the least impressive galleries of existing examples), the popularity of the Jupyter notebook framework with the possibility to run R codes or compiled programs written in C++, and much more made our choice of programming language for this series of lectures easy. However, since the focus here is not only on using existing Python libraries such as Scikit-Learn, Tensorflow and Pytorch, but also on developing your own algorithms and codes, we will as far as possible present many of these algorithms either as a Python codes or C++ or Fortran (or other languages) codes.
We will make extensive use of Python as programming language and its myriad of available libraries. You will find Jupyter notebooks invaluable in your work. You can run R codes in the Jupyter/IPython notebooks, with the immediate benefit of visualizing your data. You can also use compiled languages like C++, Rust, Julia, Fortran etc if you prefer. The focus in these lectures will be on Python.
If you have Python installed (we strongly recommend Python3) and you feel pretty familiar with installing different packages, we recommend that you install the following Python packages via pip as (examples of relevant packages)
If you don't want to perform these operations separately and venture into the hassle of exploring how to set up dependencies and paths, we recommend two widely used distrubutions which set up all relevant dependencies for Python, namely
which is an open source distribution of the Python and R programming languages for large-scale data processing, predictive analytics, and scientific computing, that aims to simplify package management and deployment. Package versions are managed by the package management system conda. is a Python distribution for scientific and analytic computing distribution and analysis environment, available for free and under a commercial license.Furthermore, Google's Colab is a free Jupyter notebook environment that requires no setup and runs entirely in the cloud. Try it out!
$$ \mathbf{A} = \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} & a_{14} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} & a_{24} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} & a_{34} \\ a_{41} & a_{42} & a_{43} & a_{44} \end{bmatrix}\qquad \mathbf{I} = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} $$
The inverse of a matrix is defined by $$ \mathbf{A}^{-1} \cdot \mathbf{A} = I $$
| Relations | Name | matrix elements |
|---|---|---|
| \( A = A^{T} \) | symmetric | \( a_{ij} = a_{ji} \) |
| \( A = \left (A^{T} \right )^{-1} \) | real orthogonal | \( \sum_k a_{ik} a_{jk} = \sum_k a_{ki} a_{kj} = \delta_{ij} \) |
| \( A = A^{ * } \) | real matrix | \( a_{ij} = a_{ij}^{ * } \) |
| \( A = A^{\dagger} \) | hermitian | \( a_{ij} = a_{ji}^{ * } \) |
| \( A = \left (A^{\dagger} \right )^{-1} \) | unitary | \( \sum_k a_{ik} a_{jk}^{ * } = \sum_k a_{ki}^{ * } a_{kj} = \delta_{ij} \) |
For an \( N\times N \) matrix \( \mathbf{A} \) the following properties are all equivalent
import numpy as np
Here follows a simple example where we set up an array of ten elements, all determined by random numbers drawn according to the normal distribution,
n = 10
x = np.random.normal(size=n)
print(x)
We defined a vector \( x \) with \( n=10 \) elements with its values given by the Normal distribution \( N(0,1) \). Another alternative is to declare a vector as follows
import numpy as np
x = np.array([1, 2, 3])
print(x)
Here we have defined a vector with three elements, with \( x_0=1 \), \( x_1=2 \) and \( x_2=3 \). Note that both Python and C++ start numbering array elements from \( 0 \) and on. This means that a vector with \( n \) elements has a sequence of entities \( x_0, x_1, x_2, \dots, x_{n-1} \). We could also let (recommended) Numpy to compute the logarithms of a specific array as
import numpy as np
x = np.log(np.array([4, 7, 8]))
print(x)
In the last example we used Numpy's unary function \( np.log \). This function is highly tuned to compute array elements since the code is vectorized and does not require looping. We normaly recommend that you use the Numpy intrinsic functions instead of the corresponding log function from Python's math module. The looping is done explicitely by the np.log function. The alternative, and slower way to compute the logarithms of a vector would be to write
import numpy as np
from math import log
x = np.array([4, 7, 8])
for i in range(0, len(x)):
x[i] = log(x[i])
print(x)
We note that our code is much longer already and we need to import the log function from the math module. The attentive reader will also notice that the output is \( [1, 1, 2] \). Python interprets automagically our numbers as integers (like the automatic keyword in C++). To change this we could define our array elements to be double precision numbers as
import numpy as np
x = np.log(np.array([4, 7, 8], dtype = np.float64))
print(x)
or simply write them as double precision numbers (Python uses 64 bits as default for floating point type variables), that is
import numpy as np
x = np.log(np.array([4.0, 7.0, 8.0])
print(x)
To check the number of bytes (remember that one byte contains eight bits for double precision variables), you can use simple use the itemsize functionality (the array \( x \) is actually an object which inherits the functionalities defined in Numpy) as
import numpy as np
x = np.log(np.array([4.0, 7.0, 8.0]))
print(x)
Having defined vectors, we are now ready to try out matrices. We can define a \( 3 \times 3 \) real matrix \( \boldsymbol{A} \) as (recall that we user lowercase letters for vectors and uppercase letters for matrices)
import numpy as np
A = np.log(np.array([ [4.0, 7.0, 8.0], [3.0, 10.0, 11.0], [4.0, 5.0, 7.0] ]))
print(A)
If we use the shape function we would get \( (3, 3) \) as output, that is verifying that our matrix is a \( 3\times 3 \) matrix. We can slice the matrix and print for example the first column (Python organized matrix elements in a row-major order, see below) as
import numpy as np
A = np.log(np.array([ [4.0, 7.0, 8.0], [3.0, 10.0, 11.0], [4.0, 5.0, 7.0] ]))
# print the first column, row-major order and elements start with 0
print(A[:,0])
We can continue this was by printing out other columns or rows. The example here prints out the second column
import numpy as np
A = np.log(np.array([ [4.0, 7.0, 8.0], [3.0, 10.0, 11.0], [4.0, 5.0, 7.0] ]))
# print the first column, row-major order and elements start with 0
print(A[1,:])
Numpy contains many other functionalities that allow us to slice, subdivide etc etc arrays. We strongly recommend that you look up the Numpy website for more details. Useful functions when defining a matrix are the np.zeros function which declares a matrix of a given dimension and sets all elements to zero
import numpy as np
n = 10
# define a matrix of dimension 10 x 10 and set all elements to zero
A = np.zeros( (n, n) )
print(A)
or initializing all elements to
import numpy as np
n = 10
# define a matrix of dimension 10 x 10 and set all elements to one
A = np.ones( (n, n) )
print(A)
or as unitarily distributed random numbers (see the material on random number generators in the statistics part)
import numpy as np
n = 10
# define a matrix of dimension 10 x 10 and set all elements to random numbers with x \in [0, 1]
A = np.random.rand(n, n)
print(A)
As we will see throughout these lectures, there are several extremely useful functionalities in Numpy. As an example, consider the discussion of the covariance matrix. Suppose we have defined three vectors \( \boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{z} \) with \( n \) elements each. The covariance matrix is defined as $$ \boldsymbol{\Sigma} = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_{xx} & \sigma_{xy} & \sigma_{xz} \\ \sigma_{yx} & \sigma_{yy} & \sigma_{yz} \\ \sigma_{zx} & \sigma_{zy} & \sigma_{zz} \end{bmatrix}, $$ where for example $$ \sigma_{xy} =\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(x_i- \overline{x})(y_i- \overline{y}). $$ The Numpy function np.cov calculates the covariance elements using the factor \( 1/(n-1) \) instead of \( 1/n \) since it assumes we do not have the exact mean values. The following simple function uses the np.vstack function which takes each vector of dimension \( 1\times n \) and produces a \( 3\times n \) matrix \( \boldsymbol{W} \) $$ \boldsymbol{W} = \begin{bmatrix} x_0 & y_0 & z_0 \\ x_1 & y_1 & z_1 \\ x_2 & y_2 & z_2 \\ \dots & \dots & \dots \\ x_{n-2} & y_{n-2} & z_{n-2} \\ x_{n-1} & y_{n-1} & z_{n-1} \end{bmatrix}, $$
Our matrix is in turn converted into into the \( 3\times 3 \) covariance matrix \( \boldsymbol{\Sigma} \) via the Numpy function np.cov(). We note that we can also calculate the mean value of each set of samples \( \boldsymbol{x} \) etc using the Numpy function np.mean(x). We can also extract the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix through the np.linalg.eig() function.
# Importing various packages
import numpy as np
n = 100
x = np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(x))
y = 4+3*x+np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(y))
z = x**3+np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(z))
W = np.vstack((x, y, z))
Sigma = np.cov(W)
print(Sigma)
Eigvals, Eigvecs = np.linalg.eig(Sigma)
print(Eigvals)
The probability distribution function (PDF) is a function \( p(x) \) on the domain which, in the discrete case, gives us the probability or relative frequency with which these values of \( X \) occur: $$ p(x) = \mathrm{prob}(X=x) $$ In the continuous case, the PDF does not directly depict the actual probability. Instead we define the probability for the stochastic variable to assume any value on an infinitesimal interval around \( x \) to be \( p(x)dx \). The continuous function \( p(x) \) then gives us the density of the probability rather than the probability itself. The probability for a stochastic variable to assume any value on a non-infinitesimal interval \( [a,\,b] \) is then just the integral: $$ \mathrm{prob}(a\leq X\leq b) = \int_a^b p(x)dx $$ Qualitatively speaking, a stochastic variable represents the values of numbers chosen as if by chance from some specified PDF so that the selection of a large set of these numbers reproduces this PDF.
A particularly useful class of special expectation values are the moments. The \( n \)-th moment of the PDF \( p \) is defined as follows: $$ \langle x^n\rangle \equiv \int\! x^n p(x)\,dx $$ The zero-th moment \( \langle 1\rangle \) is just the normalization condition of \( p \). The first moment, \( \langle x\rangle \), is called the mean of \( p \) and often denoted by the letter \( \mu \): $$ \langle x\rangle = \mu \equiv \int\! x p(x)\,dx $$
A special version of the moments is the set of central moments, the n-th central moment defined as: $$ \langle (x-\langle x \rangle )^n\rangle \equiv \int\! (x-\langle x\rangle)^n p(x)\,dx $$ The zero-th and first central moments are both trivial, equal \( 1 \) and \( 0 \), respectively. But the second central moment, known as the variance of \( p \), is of particular interest. For the stochastic variable \( X \), the variance is denoted as \( \sigma^2_X \) or \( \mathrm{var}(X) \): $$ \begin{align} \sigma^2_X\ \ =\ \ \mathrm{var}(X) & = \langle (x-\langle x\rangle)^2\rangle = \int\! (x-\langle x\rangle)^2 p(x)\,dx \label{_auto1}\\ & = \int\! \left(x^2 - 2 x \langle x\rangle^{2} + \langle x\rangle^2\right)p(x)\,dx \label{_auto2}\\ & = \langle x^2\rangle - 2 \langle x\rangle\langle x\rangle + \langle x\rangle^2 \label{_auto3}\\ & = \langle x^2\rangle - \langle x\rangle^2 \label{_auto4} \end{align} $$ The square root of the variance, \( \sigma =\sqrt{\langle (x-\langle x\rangle)^2\rangle} \) is called the standard deviation of \( p \). It is clearly just the RMS (root-mean-square) value of the deviation of the PDF from its mean value, interpreted qualitatively as the spread of \( p \) around its mean.
Another important quantity is the so called covariance, a variant of the above defined variance. Consider again the set \( \{X_i\} \) of \( n \) stochastic variables (not necessarily uncorrelated) with the multivariate PDF \( P(x_1,\dots,x_n) \). The covariance of two of the stochastic variables, \( X_i \) and \( X_j \), is defined as follows: $$ \begin{align} \mathrm{cov}(X_i,\,X_j) &\equiv \langle (x_i-\langle x_i\rangle)(x_j-\langle x_j\rangle)\rangle \nonumber\\ &= \int\!\cdots\!\int\!(x_i-\langle x_i \rangle)(x_j-\langle x_j \rangle)\, P(x_1,\dots,x_n)\,dx_1\dots dx_n \label{eq:def_covariance} \end{align} $$ with $$ \langle x_i\rangle = \int\!\cdots\!\int\!x_i\,P(x_1,\dots,x_n)\,dx_1\dots dx_n $$
If we consider the above covariance as a matrix \( C_{ij}=\mathrm{cov}(X_i,\,X_j) \), then the diagonal elements are just the familiar variances, \( C_{ii} = \mathrm{cov}(X_i,\,X_i) = \mathrm{var}(X_i) \). It turns out that all the off-diagonal elements are zero if the stochastic variables are uncorrelated. This is easy to show, keeping in mind the linearity of the expectation value. Consider the stochastic variables \( X_i \) and \( X_j \), (\( i\neq j \)): $$ \begin{align} \mathrm{cov}(X_i,\,X_j) &= \langle(x_i-\langle x_i\rangle)(x_j-\langle x_j\rangle)\rangle \label{_auto5}\\ &=\langle x_i x_j - x_i\langle x_j\rangle - \langle x_i\rangle x_j + \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle\rangle \label{_auto6}\\ &=\langle x_i x_j\rangle - \langle x_i\langle x_j\rangle\rangle - \langle \langle x_i\rangle x_j\rangle + \langle \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle\rangle \label{_auto7}\\ &=\langle x_i x_j\rangle - \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle - \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle + \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle \label{_auto8}\\ &=\langle x_i x_j\rangle - \langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle \label{_auto9} \end{align} $$
If \( X_i \) and \( X_j \) are independent, we get \( \langle x_i x_j\rangle =\langle x_i\rangle\langle x_j\rangle \), resulting in \( \mathrm{cov}(X_i, X_j) = 0\ \ (i\neq j) \).
We normally use the acronym iid for independent and identically distributed stochastic variables.
Since the variance is just \( \mathrm{var}(X_i) = \mathrm{cov}(X_i, X_i) \), we get the variance of the linear combination \( U = \sum_i a_i X_i \): $$ \begin{equation} \mathrm{var}(U) = \sum_{i,j}a_i a_j \mathrm{cov}(X_i, X_j) \label{eq:variance_linear_combination} \end{equation} $$ And in the special case when the stochastic variables are uncorrelated, the off-diagonal elements of the covariance are as we know zero, resulting in: $$ \mathrm{var}(U) = \sum_i a_i^2 \mathrm{cov}(X_i, X_i) = \sum_i a_i^2 \mathrm{var}(X_i) $$ $$ \mathrm{var}(\sum_i a_i X_i) = \sum_i a_i^2 \mathrm{var}(X_i) $$ which will become very useful in our study of the error in the mean value of a set of measurements.
A stochastic process is a process that produces sequentially a chain of values: $$ \{x_1, x_2,\dots\,x_k,\dots\}. $$ We will call these values our measurements and the entire set as our measured sample. The action of measuring all the elements of a sample we will call a stochastic experiment since, operationally, they are often associated with results of empirical observation of some physical or mathematical phenomena; precisely an experiment. We assume that these values are distributed according to some PDF \( p_X^{\phantom X}(x) \), where \( X \) is just the formal symbol for the stochastic variable whose PDF is \( p_X^{\phantom X}(x) \). Instead of trying to determine the full distribution \( p \) we are often only interested in finding the few lowest moments, like the mean \( \mu_X^{\phantom X} \) and the variance \( \sigma_X^{\phantom X} \).
In practical situations a sample is always of finite size. Let that size be \( n \). The expectation value of a sample, the sample mean, is then defined as follows: $$ \bar{x}_n \equiv \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n x_k $$ The sample variance is: $$ \mathrm{var}(x) \equiv \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n (x_k - \bar{x}_n)^2 $$ its square root being the standard deviation of the sample. The sample covariance is: $$ \mathrm{cov}(x)\equiv\frac{1}{n}\sum_{kl}(x_k - \bar{x}_n)(x_l - \bar{x}_n) $$
Note that the sample variance is the sample covariance without the cross terms. In a similar manner as the covariance in Eq. \eqref{eq:def_covariance} is a measure of the correlation between two stochastic variables, the above defined sample covariance is a measure of the sequential correlation between succeeding measurements of a sample.
These quantities, being known experimental values, differ significantly from and must not be confused with the similarly named quantities for stochastic variables, mean \( \mu_X \), variance \( \mathrm{var}(X) \) and covariance \( \mathrm{cov}(X,Y) \).
The law of large numbers states that as the size of our sample grows to infinity, the sample mean approaches the true mean \( \mu_X^{\phantom X} \) of the chosen PDF: $$ \lim_{n\to\infty}\bar{x}_n = \mu_X^{\phantom X} $$ The sample mean \( \bar{x}_n \) works therefore as an estimate of the true mean \( \mu_X^{\phantom X} \).
What we need to find out is how good an approximation \( \bar{x}_n \) is to \( \mu_X^{\phantom X} \). In any stochastic measurement, an estimated mean is of no use to us without a measure of its error. A quantity that tells us how well we can reproduce it in another experiment. We are therefore interested in the PDF of the sample mean itself. Its standard deviation will be a measure of the spread of sample means, and we will simply call it the error of the sample mean, or just sample error, and denote it by \( \mathrm{err}_X^{\phantom X} \). In practice, we will only be able to produce an estimate of the sample error since the exact value would require the knowledge of the true PDFs behind, which we usually do not have.
Let us first take a look at what happens to the sample error as the size of the sample grows. In a sample, each of the measurements \( x_i \) can be associated with its own stochastic variable \( X_i \). The stochastic variable \( \overline X_n \) for the sample mean \( \bar{x}_n \) is then just a linear combination, already familiar to us: $$ \overline X_n = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i $$ All the coefficients are just equal \( 1/n \). The PDF of \( \overline X_n \), denoted by \( p_{\overline X_n}(x) \) is the desired PDF of the sample means.
The probability density of obtaining a sample mean \( \bar x_n \) is the product of probabilities of obtaining arbitrary values \( x_1, x_2,\dots,x_n \) with the constraint that the mean of the set \( \{x_i\} \) is \( \bar x_n \): $$ p_{\overline X_n}(x) = \int p_X^{\phantom X}(x_1)\cdots \int p_X^{\phantom X}(x_n)\ \delta\!\left(x - \frac{x_1+x_2+\dots+x_n}{n}\right)dx_n \cdots dx_1 $$ And in particular we are interested in its variance \( \mathrm{var}(\overline X_n) \).
It is generally not possible to express \( p_{\overline X_n}(x) \) in a closed form given an arbitrary PDF \( p_X^{\phantom X} \) and a number \( n \). But for the limit \( n\to\infty \) it is possible to make an approximation. The very important result is called the central limit theorem. It tells us that as \( n \) goes to infinity, \( p_{\overline X_n}(x) \) approaches a Gaussian distribution whose mean and variance equal the true mean and variance, \( \mu_{X}^{\phantom X} \) and \( \sigma_{X}^{2} \), respectively: $$ \begin{equation} \lim_{n\to\infty} p_{\overline X_n}(x) = \left(\frac{n}{2\pi\mathrm{var}(X)}\right)^{1/2} e^{-\frac{n(x-\bar x_n)^2}{2\mathrm{var}(X)}} \label{eq:central_limit_gaussian} \end{equation} $$
Suppose we have defined three vectors \( \boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{z} \) with \( n \) elements each. The covariance matrix is defined as $$ \boldsymbol{\Sigma} = \begin{bmatrix} \sigma_{xx} & \sigma_{xy} & \sigma_{xz} \\ \sigma_{yx} & \sigma_{yy} & \sigma_{yz} \\ \sigma_{zx} & \sigma_{zy} & \sigma_{zz} \end{bmatrix}, $$ where for example $$ \sigma_{xy} =\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(x_i- \overline{x})(y_i- \overline{y}). $$
The Numpy function np.cov calculates the covariance elements using the factor \( 1/(n-1) \) instead of \( 1/n \) since it assumes we do not have the exact mean values.
The following simple function uses the np.vstack function which takes each vector of dimension \( 1\times n \) and produces a \( 3\times n \) matrix \( \boldsymbol{W} \) $$ \boldsymbol{W} = \begin{bmatrix} x_0 & y_0 & z_0 \\ x_1 & y_1 & z_1 \\ x_2 & y_2 & z_2 \\ \dots & \dots & \dots \\ x_{n-2} & y_{n-2} & z_{n-2} \\ x_{n-1} & y_{n-1} & z_{n-1} \end{bmatrix}, $$
which in turn is converted into into the \( 3\times 3 \) covariance matrix \( \boldsymbol{\Sigma} \) via the Numpy function np.cov(). We note that we can also calculate the mean value of each set of samples \( \boldsymbol{x} \) etc using the Numpy function np.mean(x). We can also extract the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix through the np.linalg.eig() function.
# Importing various packages
import numpy as np
n = 100
x = np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(x))
y = 4+3*x+np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(y))
z = x**3+np.random.normal(size=n)
print(np.mean(z))
W = np.vstack((x, y, z))
Sigma = np.cov(W)
print(Sigma)
Another useful Python package is pandas, which is an open source library providing high-performance, easy-to-use data structures and data analysis tools for Python. pandas stands for panel data, a term borrowed from econometrics and is an efficient library for data analysis with an emphasis on tabular data. pandas has two major classes, the DataFrame class with two-dimensional data objects and tabular data organized in columns and the class Series with a focus on one-dimensional data objects. Both classes allow you to index data easily as we will see in the examples below. pandas allows you also to perform mathematical operations on the data, spanning from simple reshapings of vectors and matrices to statistical operations.
The following simple example shows how we can, in an easy way make tables of our data. Here we define a data set which includes names, place of birth and date of birth, and displays the data in an easy to read way. We will see repeated use of pandas, in particular in connection with classification of data.
import pandas as pd
from IPython.display import display
data = {'First Name': ["Frodo", "Bilbo", "Aragorn II", "Samwise"],
'Last Name': ["Baggins", "Baggins","Elessar","Gamgee"],
'Place of birth': ["Shire", "Shire", "Eriador", "Shire"],
'Date of Birth T.A.': [2968, 2890, 2931, 2980]
}
data_pandas = pd.DataFrame(data)
display(data_pandas)
In the above we have imported pandas with the shorthand pd, the latter has become the standard way we import pandas. We make then a list of various variables and reorganize the aboves lists into a DataFrame and then print out a neat table with specific column labels as Name, place of birth and date of birth. Displaying these results, we see that the indices are given by the default numbers from zero to three. pandas is extremely flexible and we can easily change the above indices by defining a new type of indexing as
data_pandas = pd.DataFrame(data,index=['Frodo','Bilbo','Aragorn','Sam'])
display(data_pandas)
Thereafter we display the content of the row which begins with the index Aragorn
display(data_pandas.loc['Aragorn'])
We can easily append data to this, for example
new_hobbit = {'First Name': ["Peregrin"],
'Last Name': ["Took"],
'Place of birth': ["Shire"],
'Date of Birth T.A.': [2990]
}
data_pandas=data_pandas.append(pd.DataFrame(new_hobbit, index=['Pippin']))
display(data_pandas)
Here are other examples where we use the DataFrame functionality to handle arrays, now with more interesting features for us, namely numbers. We set up a matrix of dimensionality \( 10\times 5 \) and compute the mean value and standard deviation of each column. Similarly, we can perform mathematial operations like squaring the matrix elements and many other operations.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from IPython.display import display
np.random.seed(100)
# setting up a 10 x 5 matrix
rows = 10
cols = 5
a = np.random.randn(rows,cols)
df = pd.DataFrame(a)
display(df)
print(df.mean())
print(df.std())
display(df**2)
Thereafter we can select specific columns only and plot final results
df.columns = ['First', 'Second', 'Third', 'Fourth', 'Fifth']
df.index = np.arange(10)
display(df)
print(df['Second'].mean() )
print(df.info())
print(df.describe())
from pylab import plt, mpl
plt.style.use('seaborn')
mpl.rcParams['font.family'] = 'serif'
df.cumsum().plot(lw=2.0, figsize=(10,6))
plt.show()
df.plot.bar(figsize=(10,6), rot=15)
plt.show()
We can produce a \( 4\times 4 \) matrix
b = np.arange(16).reshape((4,4))
print(b)
df1 = pd.DataFrame(b)
print(df1)
and many other operations.
The Series class is another important class included in pandas. You can view it as a specialization of DataFrame but where we have just a single column of data. It shares many of the same features as _DataFrame. As with DataFrame, most operations are vectorized, achieving thereby a high performance when dealing with computations of arrays, in particular labeled arrays. As we will see below it leads also to a very concice code close to the mathematical operations we may be interested in. For multidimensional arrays, we also recommend xarray. xarray has much of the same flexibility as pandas, but allows for the extension to higher dimensions than two. We will see examples later of the usage of both pandas and xarray.
In order to study various Machine Learning algorithms, we need to access data. Acccessing data is an essential step in all machine learning algorithms. In particular, setting up the so-called design matrix (to be defined below) is often the first element we need in order to perform our calculations. To set up the design matrix means reading (and later, when the calculations are done, writing) data in various formats, The formats span from reading files from disk, loading data from databases and interacting with online sources like web application programming interfaces (APIs).
In handling various input formats, as discussed above, we will often stay with pandas, a Python package which allows us, in a seamless and painless way, to deal with a multitude of formats, from standard csv (comma separated values) files, via excel, html to hdf5 formats. With pandas and the DataFrame and Series functionalities we are able to convert text data into the calculational formats we need for a specific algorithm. And our code is going to be pretty close the basic mathematical expressions.
Our first data set is going to be a classic from nuclear physics, namely all available data on binding energies. Don't be intimidated if you are not familiar with nuclear physics. It serves simply as an example here of a data set.
We will show some of the strengths of packages like Scikit-Learn in fitting nuclear binding energies to specific functions using linear regression first. Then, as a teaser, we will show you how you can easily implement other algorithms like decision trees and random forests and neural networks.
But before we really start with nuclear physics data, let's just look at some simpler polynomial fitting cases, such as, (don't be offended) fitting straight lines!
We start with perhaps our simplest possible example, using Scikit-Learn to perform linear regression analysis on a data set produced by us.
What follows is a simple Python code where we have defined a function \( y \) in terms of the variable \( x \). Both are defined as vectors with \( 100 \) entries. The numbers in the vector \( \boldsymbol{x} \) are given by random numbers generated with a uniform distribution with entries \( x_i \in [0,1] \) (more about probability distribution functions later). These values are then used to define a function \( y(x) \) (tabulated again as a vector) with a linear dependence on \( x \) plus a random noise added via the normal distribution.
The Numpy functions are imported used the import numpy as np statement and the random number generator for the uniform distribution is called using the function np.random.rand(), where we specificy that we want \( 100 \) random variables. Using Numpy we define automatically an array with the specified number of elements, \( 100 \) in our case. With the Numpy function randn() we can compute random numbers with the normal distribution (mean value \( \mu \) equal to zero and variance \( \sigma^2 \) set to one) and produce the values of \( y \) assuming a linear dependence as function of \( x \) $$ y = 2x+N(0,1), $$
where \( N(0,1) \) represents random numbers generated by the normal distribution. From Scikit-Learn we import then the LinearRegression functionality and make a prediction \( \tilde{y} = \alpha + \beta x \) using the function fit(x,y). We call the set of data \( (\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{y}) \) for our training data. The Python package scikit-learn has also a functionality which extracts the above fitting parameters \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) (see below). Later we will distinguish between training data and test data.
For plotting we use the Python package matplotlib which produces publication quality figures. Feel free to explore the extensive gallery of examples. In this example we plot our original values of \( x \) and \( y \) as well as the prediction ypredict (\( \tilde{y} \)), which attempts at fitting our data with a straight line.
The Python code follows here.
# Importing various packages
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
x = np.random.rand(100,1)
y = 2*x+np.random.randn(100,1)
linreg = LinearRegression()
linreg.fit(x,y)
xnew = np.array([[0],[1]])
ypredict = linreg.predict(xnew)
plt.plot(xnew, ypredict, "r-")
plt.plot(x, y ,'ro')
plt.axis([0,1.0,0, 5.0])
plt.xlabel(r'$x$')
plt.ylabel(r'$y$')
plt.title(r'Simple Linear Regression')
plt.show()
This example serves several aims. It allows us to demonstrate several aspects of data analysis and later machine learning algorithms. The immediate visualization shows that our linear fit is not impressive. It goes through the data points, but there are many outliers which are not reproduced by our linear regression. We could now play around with this small program and change for example the factor in front of \( x \) and the normal distribution. Try to change the function \( y \) to $$ y = 10x+0.01 \times N(0,1), $$
where \( x \) is defined as before. Does the fit look better? Indeed, by reducing the role of the noise given by the normal distribution we see immediately that our linear prediction seemingly reproduces better the training set. However, this testing 'by the eye' is obviouly not satisfactory in the long run. Here we have only defined the training data and our model, and have not discussed a more rigorous approach to the cost function.
We need more rigorous criteria in defining whether we have succeeded or not in modeling our training data. You will be surprised to see that many scientists seldomly venture beyond this 'by the eye' approach. A standard approach for the cost function is the so-called \( \chi^2 \) function (a variant of the mean-squared error (MSE)) $$ \chi^2 = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{(y_i-\tilde{y}_i)^2}{\sigma_i^2}, $$
where \( \sigma_i^2 \) is the variance (to be defined later) of the entry \( y_i \). We may not know the explicit value of \( \sigma_i^2 \), it serves however the aim of scaling the equations and make the cost function dimensionless.
Minimizing the cost function is a central aspect of our discussions to come. Finding its minima as function of the model parameters (\( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) in our case) will be a recurring theme in these series of lectures. Essentially all machine learning algorithms we will discuss center around the minimization of the chosen cost function. This depends in turn on our specific model for describing the data, a typical situation in supervised learning. Automatizing the search for the minima of the cost function is a central ingredient in all algorithms. Typical methods which are employed are various variants of gradient methods. These will be discussed in more detail later. Again, you'll be surprised to hear that many practitioners minimize the above function ''by the eye', popularly dubbed as 'chi by the eye'. That is, change a parameter and see (visually and numerically) that the \( \chi^2 \) function becomes smaller.
The terms cost and loss functions are often synonymous, sometimes you will also encounter the usage error function. The more general scenario is to define an objective function first, which we want to optimize. It is common to see statements like this however: The loss function computes the error for a single training example, while the cost function is the average of the loss functions of the entire training set.
There are many ways to define the cost/loss function. A simpler approach is to look at the relative difference between the training data and the predicted data, that is we define the relative error (why would we prefer the MSE instead of the relative error?) as $$ \epsilon_{\mathrm{relative}}= \frac{\vert \boldsymbol{y} -\boldsymbol{\tilde{y}}\vert}{\vert \boldsymbol{y}\vert}. $$
The squared cost function results in an arithmetic mean-unbiased estimator, and the absolute-value cost function results in a median-unbiased estimator (in the one-dimensional case, and a geometric median-unbiased estimator for the multi-dimensional case). The squared cost function has the disadvantage that it has the tendency to be dominated by outliers.
We can modify easily the above Python code and plot the relative error instead
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
x = np.random.rand(100,1)
y = 5*x+0.01*np.random.randn(100,1)
linreg = LinearRegression()
linreg.fit(x,y)
ypredict = linreg.predict(x)
plt.plot(x, np.abs(ypredict-y)/abs(y), "ro")
plt.axis([0,1.0,0.0, 0.5])
plt.xlabel(r'$x$')
plt.ylabel(r'$\epsilon_{\mathrm{relative}}$')
plt.title(r'Relative error')
plt.show()
Depending on the parameter in front of the normal distribution, we may have a small or larger relative error. Try to play around with different training data sets and study (graphically) the value of the relative error.
As mentioned above, Scikit-Learn has an impressive functionality. We can for example extract the values of \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \) and their error estimates, or the variance and standard deviation and many other properties from the statistical data analysis.
Here we show an example of the functionality of Scikit-Learn.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error, r2_score, mean_squared_log_error, mean_absolute_error
x = np.random.rand(100,1)
y = 2.0+ 5*x+0.5*np.random.randn(100,1)
linreg = LinearRegression()
linreg.fit(x,y)
ypredict = linreg.predict(x)
print('The intercept alpha: \n', linreg.intercept_)
print('Coefficient beta : \n', linreg.coef_)
# The mean squared error
print("Mean squared error: %.2f" % mean_squared_error(y, ypredict))
# Explained variance score: 1 is perfect prediction
print('Variance score: %.2f' % r2_score(y, ypredict))
# Mean squared log error
print('Mean squared log error: %.2f' % mean_squared_log_error(y, ypredict) )
# Mean absolute error
print('Mean absolute error: %.2f' % mean_absolute_error(y, ypredict))
plt.plot(x, ypredict, "r-")
plt.plot(x, y ,'ro')
plt.axis([0.0,1.0,1.5, 7.0])
plt.xlabel(r'$x$')
plt.ylabel(r'$y$')
plt.title(r'Linear Regression fit ')
plt.show()
The function coef gives us the parameter \( \beta \) of our fit while intercept yields \( \alpha \). Depending on the constant in front of the normal distribution, we get values near or far from \( alpha =2 \) and \( \beta =5 \). Try to play around with different parameters in front of the normal distribution. The function meansquarederror gives us the mean square error, a risk metric corresponding to the expected value of the squared (quadratic) error or loss defined as $$ MSE(\boldsymbol{y},\boldsymbol{\tilde{y}}) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(y_i-\tilde{y}_i)^2, $$
The smaller the value, the better the fit. Ideally we would like to have an MSE equal zero. The attentive reader has probably recognized this function as being similar to the \( \chi^2 \) function defined above.
The r2score function computes \( R^2 \), the coefficient of determination. It provides a measure of how well future samples are likely to be predicted by the model. Best possible score is 1.0 and it can be negative (because the model can be arbitrarily worse). A constant model that always predicts the expected value of \( \boldsymbol{y} \), disregarding the input features, would get a \( R^2 \) score of \( 0.0 \).
If \( \tilde{\boldsymbol{y}}_i \) is the predicted value of the \( i-th \) sample and \( y_i \) is the corresponding true value, then the score \( R^2 \) is defined as $$ R^2(\boldsymbol{y}, \tilde{\boldsymbol{y}}) = 1 - \frac{\sum_{i=0}^{n - 1} (y_i - \tilde{y}_i)^2}{\sum_{i=0}^{n - 1} (y_i - \bar{y})^2}, $$ where we have defined the mean value of \( \hat{y} \) as $$ \bar{y} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n - 1} y_i. $$ Another quantity taht we will meet again in our discussions of regression analysis is the mean absolute error (MAE), a risk metric corresponding to the expected value of the absolute error loss or what we call the \( l1 \)-norm loss. In our discussion above we presented the relative error. The MAE is defined as follows $$ \text{MAE}(\boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{\tilde{y}}) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \left| y_i - \tilde{y}_i \right|. $$ We present the squared logarithmic (quadratic) error $$ \text{MSLE}(\boldsymbol{y}, \boldsymbol{\tilde{y}}) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^{n - 1} (\log_e (1 + y_i) - \log_e (1 + \tilde{y}_i) )^2, $$
where \( \log_e (x) \) stands for the natural logarithm of \( x \). This error estimate is best to use when targets having exponential growth, such as population counts, average sales of a commodity over a span of years etc.
Finally, another cost function is the Huber cost function used in robust regression.
The rationale behind this possible cost function is its reduced sensitivity to outliers in the data set. In our discussions on dimensionality reduction and normalization of data we will meet other ways of dealing with outliers.
The Huber cost function is defined as $$ H_{\delta}(a)=\begin{bmatrix}\frac{1}{2}a^{2}& \text{for }|a|\leq \delta ,\\ \delta (|a|-{\frac {1}{2}}\delta ),&\text{otherwise.}\end{bmatrix}. $$ Here \( a=\boldsymbol{y} - \boldsymbol{\tilde{y}} \). We will discuss in more detail these and other functions in the various lectures.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import random
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge
from sklearn.preprocessing import PolynomialFeatures
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.linear_model import LinearRegression
x=np.linspace(0.02,0.98,200)
noise = np.asarray(random.sample((range(200)),200))
y=x**3*noise
yn=x**3*100
poly3 = PolynomialFeatures(degree=3)
X = poly3.fit_transform(x[:,np.newaxis])
clf3 = LinearRegression()
clf3.fit(X,y)
Xplot=poly3.fit_transform(x[:,np.newaxis])
poly3_plot=plt.plot(x, clf3.predict(Xplot), label='Cubic Fit')
plt.plot(x,yn, color='red', label="True Cubic")
plt.scatter(x, y, label='Data', color='orange', s=15)
plt.legend()
plt.show()
def error(a):
for i in y:
err=(y-yn)/yn
return abs(np.sum(err))/len(err)
print (error(y))
Let us now dive into nuclear physics and remind ourselves briefly about some basic features about binding energies. A basic quantity which can be measured for the ground states of nuclei is the atomic mass \( M(N, Z) \) of the neutral atom with atomic mass number \( A \) and charge \( Z \). The number of neutrons is \( N \). There are indeed several sophisticated experiments worldwide which allow us to measure this quantity to high precision (parts per million even).
Atomic masses are usually tabulated in terms of the mass excess defined by $$ \Delta M(N, Z) = M(N, Z) - uA, $$ where \( u \) is the Atomic Mass Unit $$ u = M(^{12}\mathrm{C})/12 = 931.4940954(57) \hspace{0.1cm} \mathrm{MeV}/c^2. $$ The nucleon masses are $$ m_p = 1.00727646693(9)u, $$ and $$ m_n = 939.56536(8)\hspace{0.1cm} \mathrm{MeV}/c^2 = 1.0086649156(6)u. $$
In the 2016 mass evaluation of by W.J.Huang, G.Audi, M.Wang, F.G.Kondev, S.Naimi and X.Xu there are data on masses and decays of 3437 nuclei.
The nuclear binding energy is defined as the energy required to break up a given nucleus into its constituent parts of \( N \) neutrons and \( Z \) protons. In terms of the atomic masses \( M(N, Z) \) the binding energy is defined by $$ BE(N, Z) = ZM_H c^2 + Nm_n c^2 - M(N, Z)c^2 , $$ where \( M_H \) is the mass of the hydrogen atom and \( m_n \) is the mass of the neutron. In terms of the mass excess the binding energy is given by $$ BE(N, Z) = Z\Delta_H c^2 + N\Delta_n c^2 -\Delta(N, Z)c^2 , $$ where \( \Delta_H c^2 = 7.2890 \) MeV and \( \Delta_n c^2 = 8.0713 \) MeV.
A popular and physically intuitive model which can be used to parametrize the experimental binding energies as function of \( A \), is the so-called liquid drop model. The ansatz is based on the following expression $$ BE(N,Z) = a_1A-a_2A^{2/3}-a_3\frac{Z^2}{A^{1/3}}-a_4\frac{(N-Z)^2}{A}, $$
where \( A \) stands for the number of nucleons and the $a_i$s are parameters which are determined by a fit to the experimental data.
To arrive at the above expression we have assumed that we can make the following assumptions:
Let us start with reading and organizing our data. We start with the compilation of masses and binding energies from 2016. After having downloaded this file to our own computer, we are now ready to read the file and start structuring our data.
We start with preparing folders for storing our calculations and the data file over masses and binding energies. We import also various modules that we will find useful in order to present various Machine Learning methods. Here we focus mainly on the functionality of scikit-learn.
# Common imports
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import sklearn.linear_model as skl
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error, r2_score, mean_absolute_error
import os
# Where to save the figures and data files
PROJECT_ROOT_DIR = "Results"
FIGURE_ID = "Results/FigureFiles"
DATA_ID = "DataFiles/"
if not os.path.exists(PROJECT_ROOT_DIR):
os.mkdir(PROJECT_ROOT_DIR)
if not os.path.exists(FIGURE_ID):
os.makedirs(FIGURE_ID)
if not os.path.exists(DATA_ID):
os.makedirs(DATA_ID)
def image_path(fig_id):
return os.path.join(FIGURE_ID, fig_id)
def data_path(dat_id):
return os.path.join(DATA_ID, dat_id)
def save_fig(fig_id):
plt.savefig(image_path(fig_id) + ".png", format='png')
infile = open(data_path("MassEval2016.dat"),'r')
Our next step is to read the data on experimental binding energies and reorganize them as functions of the mass number \( A \), the number of protons \( Z \) and neutrons \( N \) using pandas. Before we do this it is always useful (unless you have a binary file or other types of compressed data) to actually open the file and simply take a look at it!
In particular, the program that outputs the final nuclear masses is written in Fortran with a specific format. It means that we need to figure out the format and which columns contain the data we are interested in. Pandas comes with a function that reads formatted output. After having admired the file, we are now ready to start massaging it with pandas. The file begins with some basic format information.
"""
This is taken from the data file of the mass 2016 evaluation.
All files are 3436 lines long with 124 character per line.
Headers are 39 lines long.
col 1 : Fortran character control: 1 = page feed 0 = line feed
format : a1,i3,i5,i5,i5,1x,a3,a4,1x,f13.5,f11.5,f11.3,f9.3,1x,a2,f11.3,f9.3,1x,i3,1x,f12.5,f11.5
These formats are reflected in the pandas widths variable below, see the statement
widths=(1,3,5,5,5,1,3,4,1,13,11,11,9,1,2,11,9,1,3,1,12,11,1),
Pandas has also a variable header, with length 39 in this case.
"""
The data we are interested in are in columns 2, 3, 4 and 11, giving us the number of neutrons, protons, mass numbers and binding energies, respectively. We add also for the sake of completeness the element name. The data are in fixed-width formatted lines and we will covert them into the pandas DataFrame structure.
# Read the experimental data with Pandas
Masses = pd.read_fwf(infile, usecols=(2,3,4,6,11),
names=('N', 'Z', 'A', 'Element', 'Ebinding'),
widths=(1,3,5,5,5,1,3,4,1,13,11,11,9,1,2,11,9,1,3,1,12,11,1),
header=39,
index_col=False)
# Extrapolated values are indicated by '#' in place of the decimal place, so
# the Ebinding column won't be numeric. Coerce to float and drop these entries.
Masses['Ebinding'] = pd.to_numeric(Masses['Ebinding'], errors='coerce')
Masses = Masses.dropna()
# Convert from keV to MeV.
Masses['Ebinding'] /= 1000
# Group the DataFrame by nucleon number, A.
Masses = Masses.groupby('A')
# Find the rows of the grouped DataFrame with the maximum binding energy.
Masses = Masses.apply(lambda t: t[t.Ebinding==t.Ebinding.max()])
We have now read in the data, grouped them according to the variables we are interested in. We see how easy it is to reorganize the data using pandas. If we were to do these operations in C/C++ or Fortran, we would have had to write various functions/subroutines which perform the above reorganizations for us. Having reorganized the data, we can now start to make some simple fits using both the functionalities in numpy and Scikit-Learn afterwards.
Now we define five variables which contain the number of nucleons \( A \), the number of protons \( Z \) and the number of neutrons \( N \), the element name and finally the energies themselves.
A = Masses['A']
Z = Masses['Z']
N = Masses['N']
Element = Masses['Element']
Energies = Masses['Ebinding']
print(Masses)
The next step, and we will define this mathematically later, is to set up the so-called design/feature matrix. We will throughout label this matrix as \( \boldsymbol{X} \). It has dimensionality \( n\times p \), where \( n \) is the number of data points and \( p \) are the so-called features/predictors. In our case here they are given by the number of polynomials in \( A \) we wish to include in the fit.
# Now we set up the design matrix X
X = np.zeros((len(A),5))
X[:,0] = 1
X[:,1] = A
X[:,2] = A**(2.0/3.0)
X[:,3] = A**(-1.0/3.0)
X[:,4] = A**(-1.0)
With scikitlearn we are now ready to use linear regression and fit our data.
clf = skl.LinearRegression().fit(X, Energies)
fity = clf.predict(X)
Pretty simple!
Now we can print measures of how our fit is doing, the coefficients from the fits and plot the final fit together with our data.
# The mean squared error
print("Mean squared error: %.2f" % mean_squared_error(Energies, fity))
# Explained variance score: 1 is perfect prediction
print('Variance score: %.2f' % r2_score(Energies, fity))
# Mean absolute error
print('Mean absolute error: %.2f' % mean_absolute_error(Energies, fity))
print(clf.coef_, clf.intercept_)
Masses['Eapprox'] = fity
# Generate a plot comparing the experimental with the fitted values values.
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.set_xlabel(r'$A = N + Z$')
ax.set_ylabel(r'$E_\mathrm{bind}\,/\mathrm{MeV}$')
ax.plot(Masses['A'], Masses['Ebinding'], alpha=0.7, lw=2,
label='Ame2016')
ax.plot(Masses['A'], Masses['Eapprox'], alpha=0.7, lw=2, c='m',
label='Fit')
ax.legend()
save_fig("Masses2016")
plt.show()
As a teaser, let us now see how we can do this with decision trees using scikit-learn. We will discuss the method in more details later.
#Decision Tree Regression
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeRegressor
regr_1=DecisionTreeRegressor(max_depth=5)
regr_2=DecisionTreeRegressor(max_depth=7)
regr_3=DecisionTreeRegressor(max_depth=9)
regr_1.fit(X, Energies)
regr_2.fit(X, Energies)
regr_3.fit(X, Energies)
y_1 = regr_1.predict(X)
y_2 = regr_2.predict(X)
y_3=regr_3.predict(X)
Masses['Eapprox'] = y_3
# Plot the results
plt.figure()
plt.plot(A, Energies, color="blue", label="Data", linewidth=2)
plt.plot(A, y_1, color="red", label="max_depth=5", linewidth=2)
plt.plot(A, y_2, color="green", label="max_depth=7", linewidth=2)
plt.plot(A, y_3, color="m", label="max_depth=9", linewidth=2)
plt.xlabel("$A$")
plt.ylabel("$E$[MeV]")
plt.title("Decision Tree Regression")
plt.legend()
save_fig("Masses2016Trees")
plt.show()
print(Masses)
print(np.mean( (Energies-y_1)**2))
The seaborn package allows us to visualize data in an efficient way. Note that we use scikit-learn's multi-layer perceptron (or feed forward neural network) functionality.
from sklearn.neural_network import MLPRegressor
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import seaborn as sns
X_train = X
Y_train = Energies
n_hidden_neurons = 100
epochs = 100
# store models for later use
eta_vals = np.logspace(-5, 1, 7)
lmbd_vals = np.logspace(-5, 1, 7)
# store the models for later use
DNN_scikit = np.zeros((len(eta_vals), len(lmbd_vals)), dtype=object)
train_accuracy = np.zeros((len(eta_vals), len(lmbd_vals)))
sns.set()
for i, eta in enumerate(eta_vals):
for j, lmbd in enumerate(lmbd_vals):
dnn = MLPRegressor(hidden_layer_sizes=(n_hidden_neurons), activation='logistic',
alpha=lmbd, learning_rate_init=eta, max_iter=epochs)
dnn.fit(X_train, Y_train)
DNN_scikit[i][j] = dnn
train_accuracy[i][j] = dnn.score(X_train, Y_train)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize = (10, 10))
sns.heatmap(train_accuracy, annot=True, ax=ax, cmap="viridis")
ax.set_title("Training Accuracy")
ax.set_ylabel("$\eta$")
ax.set_xlabel("$\lambda$")
plt.show()
Let us study the \( Q \) values associated with the removal of one or two nucleons from a nucleus. These are conventionally defined in terms of the one-nucleon and two-nucleon separation energies. With the functionality in pandas, two to three lines of code will allow us to plot the separation energies. The neutron separation energy is defined as $$ S_n= -Q_n= BE(N,Z)-BE(N-1,Z), $$ and the proton separation energy reads $$ S_p= -Q_p= BE(N,Z)-BE(N,Z-1). $$ The two-neutron separation energy is defined as $$ S_{2n}= -Q_{2n}= BE(N,Z)-BE(N-2,Z), $$ and the two-proton separation energy is given by $$ S_{2p}= -Q_{2p}= BE(N,Z)-BE(N,Z-2). $$
Using say the neutron separation energies (alternatively the proton separation energies) $$ S_n= -Q_n= BE(N,Z)-BE(N-1,Z), $$ we can define the so-called energy gap for neutrons (or protons) as $$ \Delta S_n= BE(N,Z)-BE(N-1,Z)-\left(BE(N+1,Z)-BE(N,Z)\right), $$ or $$ \Delta S_n= 2BE(N,Z)-BE(N-1,Z)-BE(N+1,Z). $$ This quantity can in turn be used to determine which nuclei could be interpreted as magic or not. For protons we would have $$ \Delta S_p= 2BE(N,Z)-BE(N,Z-1)-BE(N,Z+1). $$
To calculate say the neutron separation we need to multiply our masses with the nucleon number \( A \) (why?). Thereafter we pick the oxygen isotopes and simply compute the separation energies with two lines of code (note that most of the code here is a repeat of what you have seen before).
# Common imports
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import os
from pylab import plt, mpl
plt.style.use('seaborn')
mpl.rcParams['font.family'] = 'serif'
def MakePlot(x,y, styles, labels, axlabels):
plt.figure(figsize=(10,6))
for i in range(len(x)):
plt.plot(x[i], y[i], styles[i], label = labels[i])
plt.xlabel(axlabels[0])
plt.ylabel(axlabels[1])
plt.legend(loc=0)
# Where to save the figures and data files
PROJECT_ROOT_DIR = "Results"
FIGURE_ID = "Results/FigureFiles"
DATA_ID = "DataFiles/"
if not os.path.exists(PROJECT_ROOT_DIR):
os.mkdir(PROJECT_ROOT_DIR)
if not os.path.exists(FIGURE_ID):
os.makedirs(FIGURE_ID)
if not os.path.exists(DATA_ID):
os.makedirs(DATA_ID)
def image_path(fig_id):
return os.path.join(FIGURE_ID, fig_id)
def data_path(dat_id):
return os.path.join(DATA_ID, dat_id)
def save_fig(fig_id):
plt.savefig(image_path(fig_id) + ".png", format='png')
infile = open(data_path("MassEval2016.dat"),'r')
# Read the experimental data with Pandas
Masses = pd.read_fwf(infile, usecols=(2,3,4,6,11),
names=('N', 'Z', 'A', 'Element', 'Ebinding'),
widths=(1,3,5,5,5,1,3,4,1,13,11,11,9,1,2,11,9,1,3,1,12,11,1),
header=39,
index_col=False)
# Extrapolated values are indicated by '#' in place of the decimal place, so
# the Ebinding column won't be numeric. Coerce to float and drop these entries.
Masses['Ebinding'] = pd.to_numeric(Masses['Ebinding'], errors='coerce')
Masses = Masses.dropna()
# Convert from keV to MeV.
Masses['Ebinding'] /= 1000
A = Masses['A']
Z = Masses['Z']
N = Masses['N']
Element = Masses['Element']
Energies = Masses['Ebinding']*A
df = pd.DataFrame({'A':A,'Z':Z, 'N':N,'Element':Element,'Energies':Energies})
# Her we pick the oyxgen isotopes
Nucleus = df.loc[lambda df: df.Z==8, :]
# drop cases with no number
Nucleus = Nucleus.dropna()
# Here we do the magic and obtain the neutron separation energies, one line of code!!
Nucleus['NeutronSeparationEnergies'] = Nucleus['Energies'].diff(+1)
print(Nucleus)
MakePlot([Nucleus.A], [Nucleus.NeutronSeparationEnergies], ['b'], ['Neutron Separation Energy'], ['$A$','$S_n$'])
save_fig('Nucleus')
plt.show()